Search Results for "tariff classification"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Assessment and Out-of-Charge Order for Imported Goods. Customs Authorities Directed to Process Bill of Entry and Allow Clearance Under Correct Tariff Heading.

The petitioner, Cisco Commerce India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus directing the customs auth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order. Settlement Commission's order set aside for failing to consider submissions and provide reasons, remanded for fresh consideration.

The petitioners, M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. and its employees, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Settlement Commission, Cu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...