WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017
5 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "state monopoly"
238 result(s) found
Found 238 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
9 Jan 2026The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...
- 20
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...
- 179
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.
21 Mar 2006The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection List for Ayurvedic Medical Officer Posts. Court holds that the selection process was fair and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the preparation of the merit list.
30 Aug 2022The petitioner, a BAMS qualified doctor working temporarily under the National Health Mission, challenged the selection list for 9 posts of Ayurvedic ...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Correctness of Century Textile Interpretation on 'Unprotected Worker' Under Maharashtra Mathadi Act. Referred Question Seeks to Determine Whether Only Casually Engaged Workers Are Covered by the Act Under Section 2(11).
30 Aug 2006The Bombay High Court Full Bench was constituted to resolve a conflict arising from differing interpretations of Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Math...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Environmental Clearance Conditions for Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities. Court upholds validity of conditions imposed by Ministry of Environment and Forests under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Mumbai Waste Management Ltd. and SMS Infrastructure Ltd. challenging certain conditions imposed by t...
- 113
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.
22 Aug 2019The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...
- 279
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.
10 Mar 2010The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks 'MONTINA' and 'MONTINAL'. Phonetic Similarity Between Registered Mark 'MONTINA' and Defendants' Mark 'MONTINAL' for Medicinal Preparations Constitutes Infringement Under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
24 Dec 2013The Plaintiff, Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, who were manufacturin...
- 84
