Search Results for "section 77(1)"

193 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MIDC's Demand for Service Charges at Allegedly Agreed Rate. Service charges must be based on statutory notification under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, not private negotiation.

The petitioner, Federation of Association of Industries, through its President Shyamsundar Vasudev Agrawal, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Condominium Against Developer for Declaration of Rights Over Adjoining Plots as Barred by Limitation. Claims for Easement and Right of Way Held Time-Barred Under Articles 25, 65, and 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Plaintiffs, Beach Towers Condominium and its President, filed a suit in 2012 seeking declarations that they have a right of way and easement over ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Reinvestigation in Suicide Case — Holds That Sessions Court's Refusal to Order Reinvestigation Under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. Was Not Illegal as Trial Was at Final Stage and Application Was Filed to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case.

The applicant, Sanghshil Bhagat, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) before the Bombay High Court,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Interim Injunction. Agreement for Lease Contingent on Occupation Certificate Not Specifically Enforceable.

The appellant, Associated Bombay Cinemas Private Limited, as landlord, entered into an agreement dated 14 August 1997 with the respondent, Jamni S. Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Consider Evidence. Lower Appellate Court's Remand Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power to Prevent Failure of Justice.

The case involves a property dispute over land Survey No. 50 admeasuring 26 acres 4 gunthas situated at village Asadullabag. The original plaintiff, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Income Tax Case Regarding Refund of Excess Profits Tax. Repayment of excess profits tax received by a company in England deemed income under Section 11(14) of Indian Finance Act, 1946, irrespective of territorial source.

The appellant, McGregor & Balfour Ltd., a company incorporated in the United Kingdom with its head office there, also carried on business in India. In...