WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011
7 Mar 2012The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...
Search Results for "section 70(1)"
377 result(s) found
Found 377 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.
5 Mar 2019The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...
- 233
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Onerous Bail Conditions in Commercial Dispute Case — Directs Defreezing of Bank Account. Court held that imposing condition of depositing Rs.59 crore for bail in a case arising from a commercial transaction is unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.
10 Nov 2017The petitioners, Vyomesh Shah, Kiran Contractor, and Suhass Dumbre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Tender Conditions for Sweeping Contract in Nashik Municipal Corporation — Net Worth and Experience Requirements Upheld. Court holds that Clause 3.2.2 and 3.4.2 of RFQ are not arbitrary or discriminatory and are justified for a long-term public hygiene contract.
20 Feb 2025The petitioner, M/s. Watergrace Products, a proprietorship firm engaged in solid waste management, challenged certain conditions in a Request for Qual...
- 998
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Muslim Divorce Case — Civil Court Cannot Grant Maintenance and Matrimonial Property Relief in Suit Under Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. Held that reliefs of maintenance and share in jointly owned property are not ancillary to divorce under Section 2 of the Act and must be pursued under separate statutory forums.
2 Aug 2018The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the husband (appellant) against the judgment of the District Judge, Thane, which partly allowed the wife's ...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Registration — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Member. Registration of Dayal Smruti Cooperative Housing Society under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 upheld as petitioner was not a member and had no right to object.
16 Dec 2025The petitioner, Rachana Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...
- 136
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.
2 Apr 2014The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.
28 Nov 2011The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...
- 64
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Driver Challenging Termination — Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Employee Did Not Complete 240 Days of Service. Termination for Absence After Accident Not Retrenchment Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
2 Mar 2026The petitioner, Mangabhai Noghbhai Algotar, was employed as a driver with the respondents, BRTS City Link, Surat Municipal Corporation, from 16.12.201...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant failed to establish existence of debt or liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as loan transaction was not proved.
2 Jan 2020The appellant, Smt. Tasneem Murshedkar Mazhar, was the original complainant in a summary criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...
- 45
