Search Results for "section 397"

1278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Robbery Case — Conviction Under Section 397 IPC Set Aside as Firearm Not Actually Used. Robbery Under Section 392 IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Property.

The appellant, Ram Ratan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the MPDVPK Act, 1981, Sheopur, for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Rejects Inquiry Reports of Internal Complaints Committee for Violation of Section 13 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013. Separate Reports by Presiding Officer and Members Held Invalid, and Fresh Inquiry Ordered.

Background: Three female Assistant Professors at Shri Shivaji Science College filed writ petitions challenging their transfer orders dated 25.06.2013,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of Corruption Proceedings Due to Improper Exercise of Inherent Powers. High Court's Order Under Section 482 CrPC Was Unjustified After Dismissal of Discharge Application and Revision Petition on Same Grounds, Violating Principles Against Circumvention and Multiplicity.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madras quashing criminal proceedings against the respondent under Section 13(2) read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petition Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Challenging Discharge of Accused in Illegal Mining Case — Allegations of Fraudulent Mining Operations and Criminal Conspiracy Examined

The petitioner, an NGO, originally filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking an investigati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case. Journal Entry Set-off for Loan Repayment Does Not Violate Section 269T of Income Tax Act, 1961, as It Is Not a Repayment but an Adjustment of Mutual Claims.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted the penalty ...