Search Results for "section 195 CrPC"

202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Constitutionality of Section 17 Prohibiting Legal Representation in Senior Citizens Act Proceedings. Petitioner, an Octogenarian, Seeks Declaration That Bar on Advocates is Ultra Vires Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1960.

The dispute arose under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The petitioner, an 82-year-old man, alleged that his son...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Cognizability of Section 63 of Copyright Act in Writ Petition by Cab Aggregator; Issue Involves Classification of Offence Punishable with Imprisonment up to Three Years.

Background: The dispute arose from a complaint filed by Lahari Recording Company (respondent no. 2), a music company, against ANI Technologies Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Perjury Application Against Petitioner in Rent Control Jurisdiction Dispute. Handwritten Interpolations in Balance Sheet Were Present in Trial Court Records, No Prima Facie Case of Forgery Established Under Section 340 CrPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed an application under Section 340 read with Section 195(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking criminal procee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Court examines whether an order directing police investigation under Section 156(3) is interlocutory and whether a revision petition under Section 397 or 401 CrPC lies against such order.

A batch of criminal writ petitions and applications came before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, raising a common question o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Leave to Appeal by First Informant in Motor Accident Case — First Informant Not a 'Complainant' Under Section 378(4) CrPC. Victim Who Was Driver of Fire Tender Cannot Maintain Appeal Against Acquittal as He Was Not the Complainant in the Trial.

The applicant, Damodar Pednekar, was the driver of a fire tender involved in an accident with a motorcycle driven by the accused, Umakant Naik. The ap...