Search Results for "sample drawing date"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

W.A.Nos.2308 and 1027 of 2022

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Recovery of 100 grams smack fails as prosecution did not prove samples were drawn from entire contraband and seals were not properly affixed, violating Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Mehboob Shah, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Upholding High Court's Decision. Dispute Involved Agreement of Sale with Issues of Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a dispute over a registered Agreement of Sale dated 22.11.1990, where appellants 1, 2, and 3 agreed to sell property to responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by Nagaraju and Devaraju, who were accused Nos.1 and 2 respectively, challenging their convict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industry, 1958.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Air India Employees Guild and Air Corporation Employees Union challenging the recognition granted...