Search Results for "sales tax exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "sales tax exemption"

206 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Deemed Dealer under MVAT Act and Prospective Effect of Tax Liability. High Court of Bombay Decides on Tax Liability of Government-Constituted Trust under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002

3 Mar 2025

On the Issue of Deemed Dealer: The Court held that SASF was a “deemed dealer” under Section 2(8) of the MVAT Act. The Court found that SASF fel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.

14 Nov 2024

The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case — Rear Courtyard Not Part of Built-Up Area for Section 80-IB(10) Computation. The court held that the Tribunal cannot inquire into matters beyond the lis between the parties.

11 Mar 2014

The appellant, M/s. Commonwealth Developers, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2006-07 declaring a total income o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Based on Same Facts Already Considered During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) — Held That Change of Opinion Does Not Justify Reopening.

23 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 11 January 2011 is...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Employees' Provident Funds Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Software Consultancy Services Not Covered Under Notification Dated 17th May 1971 Issued Under Section 1(3)(b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in EPF Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Computer consultancy not covered under notification dated 17th May 1971 extending Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to establishments rendering expert services.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal that it...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)