Search Results for "sale deed admissibility"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Second Appeal Challenging Partial Decree in Partition Suit — Appellants Argue Suit Barred by Limitation Due to Revenue Entry Mutation in 1983.

The matter arose from a suit filed by daughters of deceased Kachraji Aataji claiming partition of ancestral properties, specifically land bearing surv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction in Originating Summons for Interpretation of Trust Deed. Clause 11(v) of the Trust Deed Held Not to Exclude Court's Jurisdiction; Section 80 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act Does Not Bar the Originating Summons.

The judgment arises from an Originating Summons filed by the plaintiff, a permanent trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, a public tru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.275-300 to Rs.500 per sq.m. Based on Comparable Sale Deed and Development Potential. Market Value Determined Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with 20% Deduction for Development Charges.

The appellant, Nisar Ahmed Ramzan Momin, owned two plots of land in Village Nizampur, Bhiwandi, Thane, which were acquired by the State for a developm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs.24 per sq m Uniformly. Reference Court's Classification of Land into Two Categories Set Aside Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two appeals against the Judgment and Award dated 8th August 2003 passed by the learned District Judge, Margao, in Land Acquisition C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Belated Production of Power of Attorney in Civil Suit. Foundational Pleadings Not Required at Production Stage; Trial Court's Discretion Upheld with Costs.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original deceased defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.222/2009, challenged the trial court's order dated 29.07...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...