Search Results for "restraining appointment"

606 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 606 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NALCO's Appeal, Sets Aside Injunction in Arbitration Dispute — Civil Suit for Declaration and Injunction Not Maintainable When Arbitration Agreement Exists. Objections to Arbitration Agreement Must Be Raised Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO) against the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Developer Granted Interim Relief to Take Possession of Tenements from Non-Cooperating Members Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a real estate developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver and Interim Compensation in Property Dispute. Court holds that mere filing of affidavits does not establish grave urgency warranting appointment of receiver or direction for deposit of interim compensation at an interim stage.

The appellant, Ramesh Sippy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking possession of Flat No.5/B in Shree Vijayaa Bhavan, Mumbai, claiming ownersh...