Search Results for "quota"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Teacher Promotion Case — C&V Teachers Not Entitled to TGT Quota for Headmaster Post. Rule 9(5) of Haryana School Education (Group C) State Cadre Service Rules, 2012 only gives notional conversion to TGT cadre, not eligibility for promotion against TGT quota.

The State of Haryana appealed against a Division Bench order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had allowed writ petitions filed by Sandeep Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in OAS Recruitment Case — No Right Accrues from Mere Recommendation. Mere recommendation for promotion does not confer a vested right; abolition of cadre and repeal of rules extinguishes any claim.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had directed the State to conve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.

The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against NCDRC Order in Consumer Dispute Over Biochemistry Analyser Installation. Pre-Installation Requirements Including 1KVA Online UPS and Absence of On-Board Laundry Facility Not Found to Be Deficiency in Service or Restrictive Trade Practice.

The appellant, Dr. D. J. De Souza, placed an order for a TurboChem 100 Unit from the respondent, Managing Director CPC Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd., in Augus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Rota-Quota Rule. Direct Recruitee Who Declined LDCE Promotion Cannot Claim Seniority Over LDCE Promotee.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by P. Subramaniyan against the Union of India and others, setting aside the orders of the Central Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Quashing of Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Transport Operators' Services Classified as 'Goods Transport Agency' Not 'Cargo Handling Service' Based on Binding CBEC Circulars.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment quashing show cause notices issued to transport operators unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Kerala High Court Judgment Upholding CAT Order for Inclusion in Promotion Panel. Delay and Laches Not a Bar as Representation Was Replied and Tribunal Condoned Delay.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer (APO) in the Southern Railway under the 30% Limited Departmental...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Haj Policy 2019-2023 for Haj Group Organisers. The Court upheld the policy as reasonable and non-arbitrary, finding that it was formulated after due consultation and in public interest.

The judgment concerns a challenge to the Haj Policy 2019-2023 for Haj Group Organisers (HGOs) framed by the Government of India. The petitioners, incl...