Search Results for "previous owner liability"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Appeal Under Section 166(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166(5) Held Retrospective, Applies to Pending Appeals Where Claimant Died Before Amendment.

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2011 in MVC Nos.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Dispute — Petitioner Not Liable for Predecessor's Dues. BESCOM Cannot Recover Arrears from Auction Purchaser Without Proper Notice Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, K.N. Sakrappa, proprietor of Sri Maheshwari Industries, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated 26.12.2014 issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Receiver in Family Property Dispute. Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case for Receiver When Property is in Possession of Defendants and Alternative Remedy of Partition is Available.

The plaintiff, Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, filed a suit for partition and accounts against his family members, including his mother, brothers, sisters...