Search Results for "power exchange"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "power exchange"

1868 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1868 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.

8 May 2013

These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stockbroker Dispute, Upholds Limitation and Maintainability. The Court held that the claim was within limitation due to acknowledgement of debt and that the arbitration application was maintainable despite directors' disqualification.

9 Jul 2019

The Appellant, Kaynet Finance Limited, a member-broker at the National Stock Exchange of India, was appointed by the Respondent, Verona Capital Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability on Liaison Office Activities in India Under Income Tax Act, 1961 and DTAA. Income from printing and dispatching cheques in India through liaison offices constitutes business connection and permanent establishment, making profits attributable to such activities taxable in India.

24 Apr 2020

The respondent, U.A.E. Exchange Centre, a company incorporated in the United Arab Emirates, provided remittance services for transferring amounts from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

4 May 2021

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in FERA Repeal Case — Appeal Against Post-Repeal Adjudication Order Lies Before Appellate Tribunal Under Section 19 of FEMA, Not Special Director (Appeals) Under Section 17 of FEMA. The Court held that the saving clause in Section 49 of FEMA does not preserve the appellate forum under FERA for orders passed after repeal, and the appellate forum is determined by the date of the order.

29 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The controversy centered on the proper...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings of fact and declined to re-appreciate evidence, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sharekhan Limited, a stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbi...

High Court

Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005

25 Mar 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company and Managing Director for Foreign Exchange Violations. Complaint Invalid as Director of Enforcement Failed to Comply with Proviso to Section 23D(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act Requiring Finding that Penalty in Adjudication Proceedings Would be Inadequate; Prosecution Under Rule 132A Also Incompetent After Rule Was Omitted.

23 Jul 1969

The Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, M.R. Pratap, appealed against a Madras High Court order that had dismissed their applicati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forfeiture Case Under Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976. The court upheld the forfeiture of a theatre property as the appellants failed to prove legitimate sources of funds and were associates of a person detained under COFEPOSA, with no entitlement to pay a fine in lieu of forfeiture under Section 9.

22 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka upholding an order forfeiting M/s. Platinum Theatre under the Smugglers and Foreign Ex...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

25 Apr 2024

Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)