Search Results for "loan facilities"

514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officers in SARFAESI Act Loan Recovery Dispute. Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K. Virupaksha and another, who were Deputy General Managers of Canara Bank, against the order of the Kar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no grounds to interfere with arbitrator's decision on loan recovery under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.

The petitioner, M/s. Maks Glass Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 24th April 2010 passed under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIADB Order Demanding Excess Lease Premium in Industrial Land Allotment — Refund of Rs. 100 Lakhs Ordered with Interest. KIADB Cannot Charge Premium Exceeding Government-Notified Rate Under Section 3(1) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Hadee Forging Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was allotted 2 acres of industrial land by the Ka...