Search Results for "income tax depreciation"

273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Reason to Believe. Section 148 Notice Set Aside as Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without Fresh Tangible Material.

The petitioner, Asian Paints Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and selling paints, challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. The ITAT's findings on arm's length price for software development services were based on evidence and not perverse, hence no interference under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The assessee, M/s. Indigra Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Guarantee Fee Reversal Issue Already Examined in Original Assessment and Pending Before Tribunal, Reassessment Barred by Third Proviso to Section 147 of Income-tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2014-15 on 24 November 2014, which was revised twice in Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Reference on Section 35B Deduction and Doctrine of Merger. Commissioner Cannot Reopen Allowed Deduction After Appeal Merger Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case is an income tax reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Income-tax, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Charitable Trust for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Framji Dinshaw Petit Parsee Sanatorium, is a public charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for HUF Assessee in Income Tax Case — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reasons for reopening were based on mere change of opinion and not on fresh tangible material.

The petitioner, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) carrying on cotton ginning and pressing business, challenged four notices dated 30 March 2004 issued un...