Search Results for "helper"

198 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 198 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Award Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenging the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Oral Termination by Management Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Suraj Pressings Pvt. Limited, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 04/01/2014, which allowed Complaint (ULP) No.50/2006 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Conviction under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dishonest abstraction of energy beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Special Case (Elec.) No.11 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding that Senior Engineer and Engineering Assistant are Not Workmen under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioners' Complaints under MRTU & PULP Act Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Workman Status.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's orders dated 23rd July 1999, which held that the Petitioners were no...