Search Results for "going behind decree"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree Set Aside Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Manilal Ratnabhai Solanki, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration of title and possession of suit land. He filed Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After 30 Years in Property Suit — No Prejudice as Trial Not Commenced. Pre-Trial Amendment Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay, as No New Cause of Action Introduced.

The present writ petition arises out of a civil suit filed in 1993 by the original plaintiffs, Smt. Bertha Carvalho and Shri Ross Carvalho, against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Defendant Not Liable for Rent After Vacating Premises. Tenant's Liability for Rent Ceases Upon Vacating and Handing Over Possession, Even Without Formal Termination Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendant, M. Bhaskar, against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2015 passed by the VII Additi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Easement Rights Case — Prescriptive Easement Claim Upheld Based on Long User and Acquiescence. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Granting Declaration of Easement by Prescription and Permanent Injunction.

The appellant, N. Vijendra Rao, filed a suit (O.S. No. 276/1994) before the Principal Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Mangalore, seeking a declaration of his a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...