ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "developer"
1096 result(s) found
Found 1096 result(s)
High Court
High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.
4 Apr 2025The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...
- 48
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Jan 2025The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Liability of Legal Representatives in Consumer Dispute — Death of Developer Does Not Extinguish Obligations Under Development Agreement. Legal heirs of deceased developer are bound to execute all obligations under a development agreement, including monetary payments and completion of construction, as per the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
15 Mar 2023The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the legal representatives of a deceased developer against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Red...
- 985
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Developer in Redevelopment Dispute — Restrains Cooperative Society from Terminating Letter of Intent Pending Arbitration. Termination of Development Agreement Found Prima Facie Invalid Under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Dec 2021The petitioner, Kalpataru Ltd, a real estate development company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Terrace Rights and Common Areas — Holds That Terrace Is Part of Common Areas and Cannot Be Exclusively Used by Any One Owner Without Consent of All Owners. The court set aside the trial court's decree which had declared that the plaintiff had no right over the terrace and granted permanent injunction against the plaintiff.
17 Mar 2015The appellant, Ms. Sandra Lesley Ann Bartels, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SRA Committee's Order on Slum Dweller Eligibility. The Court upheld the High Power Committee's jurisdiction to determine eligibility for rehabilitation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, rejecting the petitioners' claim for inclusion of additional tenants.
10 Feb 2015The case involves two writ petitions filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. and another challenging the order of the High Power Committe...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Chawls — Upholds Enhanced Rehabilitation Area Under DCR 33(7) and DCR 33(9). The court held that occupants who had consented to redevelopment could not later resile, and the developer's offer of 300 sq. ft. plus 75 sq. ft. dry balcony was reasonable.
5 Dec 2012The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by seven residents acting for themselves and on behalf of 217 occupants of Haji Kasam Chawls, a ...
- 352
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Possessory Protection Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court held that unregistered agreements do not confer possessory title and balance of convenience favored defendants.
18 Nov 2011The appellant, M/s. Buildtech Engineers, filed an appeal against the order of the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, which rejected its Notice of Motio...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Registration of Transfer of Shares. Held that the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding membership and transfer of shares, and that the society's bye-law amendment requiring prior approval for transfer of shares is valid.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court. The first petition (Writ Petition No. 9116 of 2013) was filed by Farhat Co...
- 95
