Search Results for "departmental enquiry after retirement"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Judicial Officer in POCSO Bribery Case — Rule 5(1)(viii) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1979. Petitioner found guilty of accepting bribe through peon for acquittal in POCSO case; disciplinary proceedings and removal upheld.

The Petitioner, a Judicial Officer appointed in 2009, was removed from service by the State of Maharashtra under Rule 5(1)(viii) of the Maharashtra Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Setting Aside of Dismissal of Judicial Officers for Non-Recording of Reasons Under Article 311(2)(b). Liberty to Initiate Fresh Proceedings with Proper Reasons Upheld as Valid.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by three judicial officers—Hari Niwas Gupta, Komal Ram, and Jitendra Nath Singh—who were dismissed from s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement Order with Modified Back Wages in Industrial Dispute — Workman's Union Activities Led to Dismissal; Labour Court's Order Upheld with 80% Back Wages.

The judgment arises from cross writ petitions challenging an order dated 25th March 1998 passed by the First Labour Court, Bombay, in Reference (IDA) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings for Misconduct. Non-Supply of Enquiry Report Before Final Order Does Not Vitiate Proceedings Absent Prejudice.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, joined the Maharashtra Judicial Service in 1990. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, and an enqui...