Search Results for "daughters liability"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Application of Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Deceased was a 25-year-old police constable; Court restored compensation with multiplier of 18, 50% future prospects, and 9% interest.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim. On 23.07.2012, Sachin Kumar, a 25-year-old police constable, died in a collision caused by a ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against School Secretary and Coordinator Under POCSO Act for Failure to Report Sexual Offences — Lack of Knowledge of Offence Precludes Liability Under Section 21 POCSO Act and Section 75 JJ Act.

The case involves three criminal applications filed by Kishor Sureshchandra Darda (Secretary of Jawaharlal Darda Education Society) and Tasnim Jafaral...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Upholds Compensation for Death of Tippu Sultan Nadaf. Claimants entitled to compensation as legal representatives under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even if not financially dependent on deceased.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The deceased, Tippu Sultan Nadaf, died in a road accident on 22.12.2010. The claima...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Non-Application of Presumptions Under Sections 118 and 139. Trial Court Erred in Shifting Burden of Proof Without Considering Rebuttal Evidence and Document Exh.28.

The appellant, Sunanda Rithe, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Madhav Rajurkar, by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...