Search Results for "dangerous activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material to Show Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue is a 'dangerous person' whose activities affect public order.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Vishal @ Gomdu @ Gomdiyo, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat City, under an order dated 01.02.2026, classifyi...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents without evidence of impact on public order cannot sustain preventive detention.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Vicky Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), was preventively detained by an order dated 11.12.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Amrel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Satisfying Material and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order based on stale and trivial offences fails to establish that the detenu is a 'dangerous person' under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, etc. Act, 1981.

16 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sharavan @ Rahul Ashok Burungale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22nd November 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Polic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Reconsideration of Previously Adjudicated Offences and Failure to Distinguish Public Order from Law and Order Invalidates Preventive Detention.

23 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Rajesh @ Dadu Eknath Nikumbh (Dhobi), challenged a preventive detention order dated 14.03.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses NIA Appeal Against Bail Granted to Accused in UAPA Case — Bail Upheld on Grounds of No Prima Facie Case of Terrorist Act. Court held that mere association with ISIS without evidence of conspiracy to commit terrorist acts does not attract Section 16 of UAPA, and Section 43D(5) bar on bail is not triggered.

23 Feb 2021

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) appealed against an order dated 17/03/2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge under the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status and Delay in Passing Order Showed Lack of Live Link.

22 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Laxman Sharnappa Dindore, challenged a detention order dated 21/06/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu Already in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Preventive detention held unjustified when there was no imminent possibility of release on bail, as the detenu had not applied for bail and was in judicial custody.

21 Jul 2010

The petitioner, father of the detenu Pritesh Dinesh Doshi, challenged the detention order dated 11/8/2009 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)