Search Results for "caste insult"

270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(10) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Village School Queue, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(10) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Rasikbhai Danabhai Chaudhary and others by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Public View Evidence. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside House, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(10) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Hirabhai Devabhai Rabari and others by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Deesa -...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Doctors in SC/ST Atrocities Case — Allegations of Caste-Based Discrimination Found to be Vague and Lacking Specific Intent. Court holds that mere use of caste name without intent to insult does not attract provisions of SC/ST Act.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by Dr. Raghavendra B. Nayak and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insults Occurred Inside Hospital Cabin, Not in Public View, Failing to Attract Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act.

The applicants, Dr. Ramesh Tukaram Bharate (a medical practitioner) and his two employees, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out. FIR under Sections 3(1)(3) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act fails to disclose essential ingredients, hence bar under Section 18 not attracted.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused in Crime No.03 of 2020 registered with Mahur Police Station, District Nand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Bail in SC/ST Atrocity Case. Accused Not Named in FIR and Absent During Incident Entitled to Bail Under Section 439 CrPC as No Prima Facie Case Established.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon granting bail to the respondent, Sumit Kishor Shastri (J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail in SC/ST Act Case for Alleged Kidnapping to Recover Debt. Court holds that bar under Section 18 of SC/ST Act does not apply when allegations under the Act are not prima facie made out, as dominant intent was recovery of money and victim not a member of SC/ST.

The appellant, Udhav Gyanoba Budhwant, filed an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Section 295A IPC Case — Facebook Post Comparing Lord Parshuram with Movie Character Not Deliberate Malicious Act. Court Held That Mere Comparison Without Intent to Outrage Religious Feelings Does Not Attract Section 295A IPC.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.73 of 2016 registere...