Search Results for "bail modification"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Lack of Valid Control Order and Insufficient Evidence. Cement Storage Allegations Fail to Sustain Conviction Under Essential Commodities Act

The Supreme Court acquitted Appellants, who were convicted under Section 3 read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for allegedly po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Deception. Conviction under Section 417 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused made false promise with intent to deceive complainant.

The appellant, Shankar, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in S.C. No. 78/2005 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Against Retrospective Maintenance Enhancement Under Section 127 CrPC. Revisional Court Erred in Directing Enhanced Maintenance from Date of Application Without Considering Husband's Objections.

The applicant husband invoked the inherent power of the High Court challenging the revisional court's order which directed that the enhanced maintenan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty and Assault in Revision Against Acquittal of Other Charges. Minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not discredit her credible evidence under Section 354 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Rajesh Swarupchand Kankaria and others (original accused nos.1 to 3) challenging their c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Writ Petition with Liberty to File Fresh Petition in Municipal Corporation Property Dispute. Court permits petitioners to withdraw petition challenging demolition notice, reserving right to file fresh petition with proper pleadings.

The petitioners, Siesta Industrial & Trading Corporation, M/s JAJ Creations Impex Pvt. Ltd., and Paresh P. Parekh, filed a writ petition before the Bo...