Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition for Correction of Date of Birth in Service Records Based on Matriculation Certificate. Employer's Refusal Set Aside as Arbitrary When Employee Consistently Used Correct Date in Subsequent Examinations and Transfers.

The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar Titus, was appointed as a Badli Loader in Western Coalfields Limited in 1984. His date of birth was recorded as 1st July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Arrears of Rent and Interest. Defendant failed to prove payment of rent for disputed period; plaintiff entitled to recovery of Rs.6,29,249/- with interest at 6% p.a. from date of suit till realization.

The present Regular First Appeal was filed by the defendant, M/s. Hinduja Fashions, against the judgment and decree dated 6.11.2015 passed by the VII ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Banking Ombudsman Dispute Over Counterfeit Drafts. Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Proceedings Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2002.

The petitioner, Bank of Baroda, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Banking Ombudsman (respondent no.2) in favor of respondent no.1, Vijaya Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Will Proved in Manner Required by Law. Court holds that a will executed by a Muslim testator is governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and must be proved in accordance with Section 63(c) and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, in Special Civil Suit No. 5 of 2000,...