Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Improper Complaint by Constituted Attorney. Complaint under Section 138 NI Act fails as attorney lacked personal knowledge and power of attorney was not proved.

The appellant, M/s. Amin Warehousing, a proprietary concern, filed a complaint through its constituted attorney against the respondent, Al Freight Int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Contract Rate in DGR-Sponsored Security Services Contract. Unilateral Reduction Without Consent Violates Contractual Terms and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, C5 Facility and Security Services, a proprietary concern registered with the Directorate General of Resettlement (DGR), was engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Service Tax Appeal Delay Case — Outer Limit of Three Months Under Section 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Extended. Appellate Authority Has No Power to Condone Delay Beyond 90 Days.

The petitioner, M/s. Agrawal Construction, a proprietary concern, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Execution Application Filed by Claimant Against Respondent in Arbitration Matter — Decision by IMPPA Committee Not an Arbitral Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a chamber summons filed by the respondent, Sanjay Dutt, seeking dismissal of an execution application filed by the claimant, Shakeel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Petition by Airports Authority Against Licensee in Public Premises Act Case. Licence Expired by Efflux of Time, Occupant Becomes Unauthorised Under Section 2(g) of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Airports Authority of India, a body corporate constituted under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenged an order dated 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Complaints for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Directors of Government Company Held to be Public Servants. Prosecution under Section 138 NI Act Without Prior Sanction is Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, M/s. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Vasantram Metha & Company Pvt. Ltd., filed criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the...