Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1921 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1921 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Criminal Complaint in Partnership Dispute Due to Settlement of First Complaint — Principle of Constructive Res Judicata Under Section 300 CrPC Applied. Second Complaint on Same Cause of Action Held Not Maintainable as Abuse of Process of Court.

The petitioners, Kamlesh and Ankur Mehta, and respondent no.2, Rajanand Sarde, entered into a partnership on 29th January 2004 to manufacture self-net...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Summons in Partnership Dispute — Allegations of Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Under Sections 420, 406 IPC. Court holds that prima facie case exists for trial, refusing to interfere with lower court orders.

The petitioners, Ramesh Dadarao Bagdure and Omprakash Satyanrayan Baheti, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Impleadment Application in Partnership Suit — Assignment of Right to Sue Does Not Confer Right to Be Substituted as Party Without Leave of Court Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC.

The present Chamber Summons was taken out by third party applicants, MahHill Properties Pvt. Ltd. and another, seeking impleadment as party defendants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Single Judge's Refusal of Interim Relief. Court holds that property acquired by siblings after father's insolvency cannot be presumed to be joint family property without evidence of joint funds or common business.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 27 August 2013 dismissing a motion for interim relief in a suit for partition. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Amendment in Cheque Dishonour Case. Amendment to Add Vicarious Liability Pleadings Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Complaint or Cause Prejudice.

The case arises from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the original complainant Syed Mazaruddin (since de...