Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Removal Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Enquiry Conducted by CEO Without Delegation of Power and Without Opportunity of Hearing Renders Removal Illegal.

The Petitioner, Sau. Sunita Pruthaviraj Meshram, was the duly elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Tekadi (Coal-Mine), Parseoni, Nagpur, elected from th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Divisional Commissioner's Power to Enhance Disqualification Period in Panchayat Election Dispute. Delegated Authority Under Section 15B of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 Includes Power to Modify Collector's Order of Disqualification.

The judgment involves two counter writ petitions arising from a dispute over disqualification of a Panchayat member under the Maharashtra Zilla Parish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Disqualified Member's Participation. Motion of no-confidence passed by 2/3rd majority held invalid as it required 3/4th majority of members entitled to sit and vote under Section 35(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Kishor Baburao Wadaskar Prasad, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Panchala in September 2015. The Gram Panchayat consisted of sev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(h1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Disqualification Quashed as No Prior Order Under Section 140 or 178 of the Act Was Passed Against the Petitioner.

The petitioner, Subhash Sakharam Shelke, was a member of Gram Panchayat, Shirpur, District Buldhana. Respondent No.3, Samadhan Waman Shelke, filed pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Due to Invalid Service of Notice. Service of notice on a relative who is not a family member and not authorized to accept is not valid under Section 35(3B) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, members of Gram Panchayat Bhoyni, challenged the order dated 04/09/2015 passed by the Additional Collector, Washim, which allowed the...