Search Results for "Habeas Corpus Petition"

389 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 389 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Non-Communication of Arrest Grounds and Lack of Public Order Impact. Preventive Detention Order Quashed as Alleged Acts Only Amount to Law and Order Issue, Not Public Order, Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Palanivel Rajan @ PTR Vinoth, was detained as a 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 by an order dated 17.09.2025 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order Due to Undated Special Report. Detenu's Likely Release on Bail Based on Undated Material Constitutes Non-Application of Mind Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Gomathi, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive detention order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority — No Further Adjudication Required. The court held that when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked, the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Chithra, mother of the detenu Rohith, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. The court held that no adjudication is required when the detention order has been revoked, and the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Snegakumari, wife of the detenu Manikandan @ Koolamani, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of 32 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Section 2(e) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sakthivel, father of the detenu Sathiyaseelan, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...