Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2491 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2491 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Rehears Quashing Petition Against Lokayukta FIR for Disproportionate Assets After Supreme Court Remand; Petitioner Alleges Absence of Preliminary Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind by Superintendent of Police Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the Public Works Department, Government of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010168012022_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...