Search Results for "Foreign witness"

424 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 424 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Satish s/o Ramesh Nandre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon Case Under UAP Act. Court Finds No Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act or Conspiracy Against Senior Professor.

The appellant, Dr. Anand Teltumbde, a senior professor and chair of Big Data Analytics at Goa Institute of Management, was arrested as accused No.10 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer, Search Vitiated.

The appellant, Kallumal Jaidmal Kukareja @ Kallumama, was convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for an offence punishable under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prohibition Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 66(2) Mandate. Failure to Send Sample Quantity for Chemical Analysis as Required by Section 66(2) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The applicant, Smt. Rozia Alex Trinedat, was convicted by the trial court under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 for being in poss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Video Conferencing for Recording Evidence of Foreign Witness in Admiralty Suit. Court Holds That Demeanour of Witness Can Be Observed via Video Conferencing Under Order 26 Rule 5 CPC.

The plaintiff, Liverpool & London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Association Ltd., filed a suit (Adm. Suit No. 32 of 2000) against m.v. 'Sea Success...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Foreign Exchange Case — Domicile Claim Rejected for Lack of Evidence. Plaintiff failed to prove domicile in Goa and jurisdiction of show cause notices under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947.

The appellant, Gangadhar Narsingdas Agarwal, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Bombay, seeking a declaration that he had been domiciled in Goa sin...