Search Results for "Export Goods"

814 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 814 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Pharmaceutical and Polyester Manufacturers for LBT Exemption Under Rule 28(6) of BPMC (LBT) Rules, 2010. Court Holds That Exemption for Goods Used in Export Covers All Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exported Finished Products, Irrespective of Place of Processing.

These three connected writ petitions filed by pharmaceutical and polyester manufacturing companies challenged the orders of the Aurangabad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Limitation Plea in Suit Alleging Fraud and Late Delivery of Goods Shipped Under Bill of Lading. Defendants Seek Dismissal of Suit on Grounds of One-Year Limitation Period Under Article III(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

(1) Background: The plaintiff, a Korean company, entered into a contract with Indian exporters for the purchase of cold rolled steel sheets to be ship...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...