Search Results for "Equitable balance"

968 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Proves Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Dated 24.05.2002 for Rs.5,50,000 with Rs.5,00,000 Advance — Defendants Failed to Execute Sale Deed Despite Notice.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 24.05.2002, wherein the defendants agreed to sell suit propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Non-Payment of Debt. Debt of JPY 64,516,217 admitted by balance confirmation and part payment, no bona fide dispute raised under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The Petitioner, Manjiro Works, a proprietory concern in the business of supplying gaming machines, filed a Company Petition under Sections 433(e) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Possession and Damages. Defendant's Possession Not Protected Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Due to Breach of Contract and Non-Performance.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Deorao Balaji Bhoyar (since deceased, through legal representatives), against the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Multiplier of 16 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Deceased Aged 35 Years.

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Chintaman Kolekar, who died in a motor vehicle accident involving a motorcycle and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of a 19-Year-Old Student. Court holds that future prospects must be considered even for non-earning deceased, and multiplier should be based on age of deceased, not claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased, a 19-year-old student named Pra...