KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "Enterprise Value"
308 result(s) found
Found 308 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.
6 Sep 2018The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...
- 224
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.
15 Dec 2022The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation by Central Warehousing Corporation — No Arbitrariness Found in Cancellation of Tender for Handling and Transport Contract. The court held that the decision to cancel the tender was based on legitimate concerns regarding financial capacity and was not arbitrary, and that bidders have no vested right until the contract is awarded.
18 Apr 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shri Siddhivinayak Enterprises and Nagnath Gangadharrao Paldewar challenging the cancellation of a t...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as agents of their members do not effect a 'sale' under sales tax laws.
3 Oct 2019The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals considered the applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to...
- 224
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.
31 Aug 2020The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...
- 186
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.
8 Jul 2025The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
2 Feb 2024The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Refuses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Rs. 54.46 Crores. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement in the overarching Logistics Agreement and Product Purchase Agreement mandates reference to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, barring the court from passing a decree in the summary suit.
12 Mar 2018The plaintiff, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., seeking a money dec...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.
16 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...
- 44
