Search Results for "BDA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "BDA"

241 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 241 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Real Estate Dispute — RERA Bar Under Section 79 Applies to Civil Suits for Possession and Damages. The court held that a civil suit for possession and damages against a developer is barred by Section 79 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the dispute falls within the purview of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves a dispute between M/s H.M. Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. (formerly a partnership firm) and the H.M. Tamborine Apartments Owners Association a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC — Allegations of Unlawful Assembly and Trespass Found Baseless. Court holds that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law as no prima facie case is made out against the petitioners.

8 Jul 2022

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking DRC in BBMP Land Acquisition Case — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement to Development Rights Certificate Under KTCP Act, 1961.

5 Apr 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the responden...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner Who Purchased Land After Notification Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

20 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Basavaraj Bhimappa Illiger, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court, Dhar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Challenge to 1988 notification filed in 2017 held barred by delay and laches as no explanation for 29-year delay was provided.

20 Jan 2020

The petitioners, owners of land in Thippasandra village, Bengaluru, challenged a preliminary notification dated 13.10.1988 issued under Section 4(1) o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants to File Written Statement in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Delay Condoned Due to Lack of Notice and Sufficient Cause. The court held that the trial court ought to have taken a liberal view and condoned the delay in filing the written statement under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, as the defendants had a right to contest the suit on merits and the delay was not intentional.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioners, who were defendants in O.S.No.6525/2012 before the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, filed writ petitions under Art...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

15 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Purchaser. The court held that the plaintiff cannot seek a declaration without establishing his own title, and that mere filing of a suit does not prove possession.

10 Mar 2015

The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Transferee. The court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a suit for declaration and injunction, as the plaintiff did not produce the will or power of attorney to establish ownership or possession.

10 Mar 2015

The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Section 28A Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 90 Days for Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

2 Apr 2013

The petitioner, Mrs. Zainabi, challenged the orders dated 14th May 2010 and 15th June 2012 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore D...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)