Search Results for "vitiates order"

812 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 812 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detenu's Right to Liberty Upheld as Detaining Authority Did Not Apply Mind to Necessity of Detention Over Criminal Prosecution.

The petitioner, Omkar Rajendra Bhosle, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3rd March 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Reliance on Extraneous Material. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Properly Consider Relevant Material and Included Cases Where Petitioner Was Acquitted or Granted Bail.

The petitioner, Mohammad Sidhik Mohammad Kausar, challenged a detention order dated 30.09.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalna under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Remand Order in Murder Case for Non-Communication of Arrest Grounds. Petitioner's arrest and subsequent judicial custody held illegal as grounds of arrest were not communicated in writing as required under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 50 of CrPC.

The petitioner, Hemanth Datta @ Hemantha @ Baby, was arrested on 17.02.2023 in connection with Crime No. 35/2023 registered at Arasikere Town Police S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's bail status and passed the order mechanically, violating the requirement of subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Shri Madhukar Mahadeo Manve, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerou...