Search Results for "seized vehicles"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 323 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nazimoddin Mohammaddin alias Nasiroddin, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 32...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession. Detailed confession recorded by Tahsildar found suspicious and insufficient for conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Chakarai @ Chakaravarthi (Accused No.1) against his conviction under Section 302 IPC and life imprisonment. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Financier in Motor Vehicle Tax Default Case — Financier Not Liable for Tax Default of Borrower Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957. Hypothecation Does Not Confer Possession or Control, Hence No Prima Facie Case Against Financier.

The petitioner, M/s. Shriram Investments Ltd. (now amalgamated with Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.), was a financier for a commercial vehicle bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Financier in Motor Vehicle Tax Default Case — Hypothecatee Not Liable for Tax Default Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957. Financier cannot be prosecuted for tax default by registered owner as hypothecation does not confer ownership.

The petitioner, M/s. Shriram Investments Ltd. (now amalgamated with Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.), was a financier for a commercial vehicle bear...