Search Results for "protected licensee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "protected licensee"

265 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

High Court

High Court Sets Aside First Appellate Court Judgment for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC in Property Dispute. Failure to Formulate Points and Adjudicate All Issues Renders Judgment Unsustainable; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision on Title and Adverse Possession.

3 Aug 2012

This second appeal arose from a property dispute over a house on nazul land in Nagpur. The original plaintiff, Jankibai (later substituted by Puniyaba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Order Rejecting Impleadment in Land Acquisition Enhancement Reference. Court Holds That Persons Interested Who Did Not Seek Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act Cannot Be Impleaded Later Under Order I Rule 10 CPC, Following Apex Court Precedent.

7 Mar 2005

The dispute arose from the acquisition of family lands for the Twin City Project at Panvel. The original owner, Shaikh Mahammed Sileman Mestry, died i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trust Dispute — Interpretation of Indenture of Trust dated 29th March 1949. Court holds that the Appellant/Plaintiff failed to establish any right, title or interest in the trust property under the Deed of Trust.

11 Jan 2019

The dispute pertains to an Indenture of Trust executed on 31st March 1949 between Parvatibai Chowhan (Settler) and Rai Bahadur Kunwar Motisingh Lalsin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Eviction of Licensee in Landmark Tenancy Case. Interpretation of Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act Clarified: Shared Licenses Do Not Confer Tenancy Rights.

17 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Petitioners, legal heir of the original defendant, confirming the eviction order passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Leave and License Dispute — Licensee Not Entitled to Protected Tenancy Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act as License Expired Before 1 February 1973. The Court held that for claiming deemed tenancy under Section 15A, the licensee must be in occupation under a valid and subsisting license on 1 February 1973; mere continuance in possession after expiry does not confer protection.

27 Sep 2024

The Petitioner (original Defendant) challenged the concurrent decrees of eviction passed by the Trial Court and the Appellate Bench of the Small Cause...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Securitisation Act Notice Against Tenant in Possession of Mortgaged Property. Petitioner failed to establish independent right or title over the secured asset, and the notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 was validly served.

20 Mar 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Ms. Yukta Mookhey against the Bank of India and others. The background is that Harmonics Fabrics Fashions L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act — Tenant's Rights Upheld. The Court held that premises owned by a nationalised company not taken over by the Central Government are not 'public premises' under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the eviction notice was invalid.

7 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Dr. Suhas H. Pophale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

16 Jun 2014

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that the First Appellate Court's finding on possession was perverse and that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by laches.

31 Jan 2014

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Shri Gurudas Yeshwant Pednekar, against the judgment of the Firs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

12 Aug 2011

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)