Search Results for "preventive detention"

718 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 718 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Reconsideration of Previously Adjudicated Offences and Failure to Distinguish Public Order from Law and Order Invalidates Preventive Detention.

The petitioner, Rajesh @ Dadu Eknath Nikumbh (Dhobi), challenged a preventive detention order dated 14.03.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay — Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated by Casual Approach. Delay of 9 months between incident and detention order held to vitiate the subjective satisfaction under MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Aalam Yosuf Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 15 September 2017 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Premature Release of Life Convicts in NDPS Act Cases — Held That Detention Beyond 14 Years Without Consideration of Remission Is Illegal. The court directed the state to consider premature release under the remission policy dated 10.02.2010 and Section 433A CrPC.

The petitioners, Bandu Shivaji More, Prashant Krushandev Jadhav, and Satyawan Mahadev Suryavanshi, were convicted for offences under the Narcotic Drug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...