COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024
2 May 2025...
Search Results for "power exchange"
1868 result(s) found
Found 1868 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals by Employer in Service Matter — Termination of Workmen Without Section 25-F Compliance Held Illegal. Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages Upheld as Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Void.
7 Feb 2013The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd. (the appellant) against the common order of a Si...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — Mitigation of Damages Upheld. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's finding on failure to mitigate damages within a reasonable period is a finding of fact not amenable to interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
19 Jul 2013The appeal arises from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 17 April 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds SEBI's Power to Regulate Fee Structure of Investment Advisors — Amendment Regulations and Circular Held Valid. Regulation 15A of SEBI (Investment Advisors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 and Circular dated 23.09.2020 are within SEBI's delegated legislative competence and do not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
18 Jun 2021The petitioner, Purnartha Investment Advisers Private Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Regulation 3(XII) of the Securities and Excha...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Writ Petition Lies Against National Stock Exchange for Termination. Maintainability Questioned on Grounds That NSE is Not State Under Article 12 and Dispute is Contractual.
16 Oct 2025The petitioner, Suprabhat Lala, was appointed as a Manager with the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on 1 October 2001 under terms and conditions set out...
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application for Enforcement of Scheme in Sanghi Motors (Bombay) Limited. Scheme formulated under Sections 397, 398, 402 of Companies Act, 1956 involves transfer of oxygen undertaking assets and cylinders.
21 Feb 2006The matter pertains to Company Application No.328 of 1990 arising out of Company Petition No.128 of 1985, filed before the High Court of Judicature at...
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Interest on Seized Amount Returned Without Interest Under FERA. Court holds that interest is payable on amounts seized and retained by the Enforcement Directorate when ultimately returned to the owner, applying principles of restitution and equity.
4 May 2010The petitioners, M/s R.K. Jewellers (a partnership firm) and M/s N.B. Exports (a proprietary concern), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 – Default in Repayment of Secured Facilities Allegedly Renders Respondent Unable to Pay Debts. Petitioner Bank Seeks Winding Up and Appointment of Provisional Liquidator After Respondent Defaults on Short-Term Loan and Letters of Credit.
14 Feb 2017The case concerned a company petition for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956, instituted by IDFC Bank Limited, a creditor, against M/s.Ruchi Soy...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...
- 233
