WRIT PETITION NO. 12656 OF 2023
8 Apr 2025The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against the order dated 31 July ...
Search Results for "perversity standard"
666 result(s) found
Found 666 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Intent. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
5 Jul 2023The appellant, Bhaskar Rao, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, for the murder of his wife Bhagyamma under Sect...
- 86
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement in Disciplinary Proceeding Despite Criminal Acquittal. Disciplinary Authority's Finding of Misconduct Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
22 Mar 2022The appeals arose from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court which set aside a compulsory retirement order imposed on a Village Accountant following ...
- 197
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Against Supervisor in Sexual Harassment Case Under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 — Natural Justice Not Violated as Inquiry Committee Followed Due Process and Findings Were Not Perverse.
29 Jan 2021The petitioner, Milind Mamlekar, a supervisor in the Estate Section of Goa University, challenged the penalty imposed on him following a complaint of ...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.
22 Dec 2020The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 354-A IPC, Section 363/511 IPC, and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
2 Dec 2020The case arises from an incident on 26 January 2016, when the informant, a 16-year-old girl, along with her cousin sister, was walking to school for R...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Eviction Orders for Non-Payment of Rent. Tenant Failed to Deposit Arrears Despite Statutory Protection Under Section 12(3)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
11 Sep 2018The petitioner, a tenant of two shop blocks since 1977-1978, was sued for eviction by the respondent landlords for non-payment of rent from 01-08-1997...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Reservation for SC/ST in CESTAT Member (Technical) Posts. Rules of reservation under Articles 16(4) and 335 of the Constitution do not apply to appointments to tribunals like CESTAT, which are governed by specific statutory provisions under the Customs Act, 1962 and Central Excise Act, 1944.
21 Apr 2014The petitioner, K. Shyamsundar, an IRS officer belonging to the Scheduled Caste, applied for the post of Member (Technical) in the Customs, Excise and...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant’s Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Default in Rent Payment Under Section 12 Upheld as No Dispute Raised Within One Month of Demand Notice.
30 Jun 2005The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by the respondent-landlord, who became owner of House No. 447B, Mahatma Phule Peth, Pune, by virtue of a...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Declaration of Perverse Findings in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court's Power to Reappreciate Evidence Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Upheld Where Enquiry Findings Are Not Supported by Evidence.
23 Mar 2005The petitioner, Tata Infomedia Limited (formerly Tata Press Limited), challenged an order of the Labour Court at Mumbai dated 23rd October 2001. The L...
- 65
