KAHC010220972024_1
20 Jul 2026These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...
Search Results for "payment deadline"
178 result(s) found
Found 178 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal under Section 11 of Arbitration Act in Escrow Dispute; Abandonment of Arbitration Alleged. Dosti Group Contends That Petitioners' Participation in Parallel Suit Without Filing Section 8 Application Constitutes Ex Facie Abandonment Precluding Arbitration.
3 Nov 2025The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated August 16, 2010, where the Dosti Group agreed to acquire a Target Company from the Kothar...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside APTEL Order on Delay Condonation in Wind Power Project and Restores CERC Order. The Court held that directing the condoned delay period to commence from the APTEL judgment date was irrational and contrary to the Power Purchase Agreement scheme, and restored the CERC order which properly computed extensions based on actual events.
27 Feb 2024The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal concerning a dispute over delay condonation in the commissioning of a wind power project under Power Purchase A...
- 408
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against KERC Order on Solar Power Tariff. The Dispute Centers on Whether Commissioning Certificate or Actual Injection of Power Determines Commercial Operation Date Under the Power Purchase Agreement.
22 May 2023The petitioner, a solar power developer, challenged an order of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that denied a higher tariff by ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Repeated Delays in Filing Written Statement. Unamended Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is Directory but Gross Negligence Justifies Striking Off Defence.
17 Jan 2020The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Desh Raj against the order of the Delhi High Court which upheld the Civil Court's decision to close hi...
- 386
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Sharebroker in Time-Barred Claim Dispute. Limitation Period for Quarterly Settlement Runs from End of Quarter Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.
13 Mar 2019The petitioner, Mukesh Mansukhbhai Kanani, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal of the National Stock Exchange, whic...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case for Interest from Date of Accident. Employer and Insurer Held Liable to Pay Interest Under Section 4A of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 from the Date of Accident, Not from the Date of Order.
27 Sep 2017The appellant, a workman, filed an application under Section 22 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 claiming compensation of Rs.2,67,252/- for inj...
- 81
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Plea for Return of Original Documents and Tuition Fees from Medical College After Candidate Attained Admission Elsewhere. Petition Alleged Illegal Detention of Documents and Demand for Full Course Fee, Raising Issues Under Medical Admissions Regulations and Judicial Precedents.
6 Jan 2017The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a medical aspirant who, after completing his higher secondary education and securing a competitive All ...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Complaint Filed During Pendency of Domestic Enquiry Held Premature. Filing a complaint before completion of enquiry restricts management's right to proceed in accordance with law under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
29 Nov 2013The petitioner, Bapu Parwati Urmude, was employed with the respondent, Premier Industries, from 1981. On 21st October 2002, the respondent alleged tha...
- 137
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.
15 Nov 2006The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...
