Search Results for "occupancy tenant"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in License Dispute — Constituted Attorney's Lack of Personal Knowledge Does Not Invalidate Suit When Plaintiff's Ownership is Undisputed and Defendant Fails to Prove Tenancy.

The dispute pertains to Room No.2 (2-A) admeasuring 290 sq.ft on CTS No. 185 situated at 1st Floor, Kumud Villa, 321, Vithalbhai Patel Road, Paper Mil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Quashing State Circulars on Temple Land Records in M.P. Land Revenue Code Dispute. Executive Instructions Found Invalid as They Sought to Override Statutory Bhumiswami Rights of Pujaris Protected Under Sections 57 and 158 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959.

The dispute arose from circulars issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh in 1994 and 2008 directing deletion of Pujari names from revenue records to pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Adverse Possession Dispute Over 70-Year-Old Land Title Conflict. The Court held that the appellant had perfected title by adverse possession despite not being the true owner, based on continuous possession from 1963 to 1981 as shown in revenue records.

The dispute originated from a 1942 purchase of suit properties by Krishnamurthy S. Setlur (KS) through his general power of attorney, H.R. Narayana Iy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Grant Dispute — Appellant Failed to Prove Occupancy as on 1.3.1974. Land Tribunal's Order Confirmed as No Material Evidence of Cultivation or Possession on Appointed Date Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The dispute in the present appeal relates to Sy.No.91 (measuring 4.15 acres) and Sy.No.92 (measuring 8.23 acres) situate in Chikkagubbi village, Banga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff's title based on Hakkupatra grant upheld by both courts below; no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Sumitra Bai, was the defendant in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff, P. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal for Full Deduction of Roof Repair Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred by tenant on replacement of common roof held to be revenue expenditure allowable in entirety as commercial expediency.

The appellant, Danesh A. Irani, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...