Search Results for "liberal interpretation"

393 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Appeal Against Compensation for Accidental Fall from Train. Deceased was a bona fide passenger who fell due to sudden jerk and jolt, not a trespasser, under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, South Western Railway, Hubli, against the order dated 28.12.2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods Sold. Arbitration Clause in Clearing and Forwarding Agency Agreement Not Attracted as Dispute Arose from Independent Sale Transactions, Not from the Agreement.

The appellant-defendant, T.A.I. Pharma Ltd., entered into a Clearing and Forwarding Agency Agreement dated 1st January 2007 with the respondent-plaint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Dismiss Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Order IX Rule 5 CPC does not apply when summons were never issued to defendants, and the provision is directory, allowing court discretion to extend time for service.

The petitioner, Sanjay Madanchand Kashyap, who was defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.769 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...