Search Results for "katha"

204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Slum Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 3 of Karnataka Slum Areas Act. Landowners succeed in challenging slum declaration due to lack of prior publication and consideration of objections.

The petitioners, owners of land in Mandya District, challenged a notification dated 07.01.2013 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya, declaring th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Res Judicata and Limitation in Will Execution Dispute. Prior US Surrogate Court decree and delay in filing render suit not maintainable under Section 11 CPC and Limitation Act, 1963.

The suit was filed by Jaswinder Paul Batra, Brinder Batra, and Sunaina Batra (plaintiffs) against Neeru Batra, Baljit Singh, ING Vysya Bank Ltd., and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Licence Agreement by MMRDA for Non-Payment of Dues. Contractual Obligations Not Fulfilled by Petitioners, Alternative Remedy Available.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Bombay Goods Transport Association and others challenging an order dated 17th August 2012 by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Act Suit — Leave and License Agreement Not a Camouflage. Court upholds Small Causes Court's finding that no landlord-tenant relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant under Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Dinesh Vasantrai Bhuta, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consolidation Orders Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Petitioners Failed to Challenge Earlier Orders in Time, and Subsequent Orders Were Merely Consequential.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 2nd February 1990 and a notice dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...