Search Results for "invalid detention order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Lack of Satisfying Material Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider all relevant facts, including the fact that the detenu was on bail, and failure to do so vitiates the detention order under Section 3(1) of MCOCA.

14 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Avinash Gopal Shilimkar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) by an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Petitioner for Non-Application of Mind and Multiple Preventive Actions on Same Set of Facts. The court held that the detention order under Section 3 of MPDA Act was unsustainable as it was based on the same facts already considered in chapter proceedings and externment proceedings, and the petitioner did not habitually commit offences to be categorized as a dangerous person.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Shri Chotu Mohan Naidu, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of detention dated 05.03.2021...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Representation. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Unexplained Delay of 22 Days in Disposal of Representation Violated Article 22(5) of Constitution.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Maimuna, wife of the detenu Sri. Akbar Siddik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Verification of Incamera Statements. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Petitioner's Bail Status and Failed to Verify Incamera Statements.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jay @ Nunya Rajesh Bhosale, challenged a detention order dated 19.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

7 Nov 2014

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu Already in Custody — Preventive Detention Based on Mere Possibility of Bail Is Invalid. The court held that a detention order under Section 3 of the MPDA Act cannot be sustained when the detaining authority's satisfaction is based on a speculative possibility of bail without any cogent material.

27 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Prakash Balkrishna Pujari, challenged his preventive detention order passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Documents Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the petitioner's application dated 2.10.2004 seeking copies of documents vitiated the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders & Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Ramesh Ramnath Shetty, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 17th September 2004 under ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)