Search Results for "inconsistent testimonies"

460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession in Live-in Relationship Case. Court holds that extra-judicial confession, if credible and corroborated, can form the basis of conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ramu Appa Mahapatar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Manda, with whom he was in a live-in relationship. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Son in Brutal Matricide Case — Gruesome Murder of 60-Year-Old Mother with Evisceration of Body Parts. Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 302 IPC and Death Penalty, Finding No Mitigating Circumstances and Rejecting Defenses of Insanity and Intoxication.

The Bombay High Court confirmed the death sentence of Sunil Rama Kuchkoravi for the brutal murder of his 60-year-old mother, Yallava, on 28 August 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Political Rivalry Motive Insufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 28th October 1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Six Accused in Brutal Dacoity, Murder, and Gang Rape Case. The court restored the death penalty for all six accused, reversing the High Court's reduction of sentence for three of them, based on the 'rarest of rare' doctrine.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from a brutal home invasion and massacre that occurred on the night of June 5-6, 2003, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 498-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dasappa, was convicted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge at Mysuru in Sessions Case No.23/2011 for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence did not form complete chain pointing to guilt.

The appellant, Biru Vithoba Shejal, was convicted by the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of his wife Rukmini and son D...