High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Former Temporary Staff Seeking Regularisation and Absorption — Petitioners Implead Registrar General, Labour Court, and District Judiciary as Respondents
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "impermissible recovery"
709 result(s) found
Found 709 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Excess Salary Recovery Dispute; Sets Aside Interest Award in Retired Employee's Case. Recovery of Excess Salary Held Impermissible Absent Misrepresentation or Undertaking on the Eve of Retirement, Aligning with Principles Against Hardship.
6 Jul 2026The High Court of Madras adjudicated a writ appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging a single judge's order that had directed refund of exc...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.
17 Dec 2024The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...
- 503
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Appellate Court's Order Directing Deposit of Fair Market Rent as Pre-condition for Stay of Eviction Decree in License Case. The court held that the principle of Atma Ram Properties applies to licensees but the Appellate Court cannot split the period of unlawful occupation; the licensee must deposit contractual compensation from termination of license till disposal of appeal.
27 Sep 2024The petitioner, Safset Agencies Private Ltd., a company dealing in art, was a licensee under a Leave and Licence Agreement dated 25 September 2006 wit...
- 1118
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.
17 Jan 2023The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Two Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
13 Sep 2022The case involves two appeals filed by Ritesh @ Rajan Janaji Bhalerao and Deepak Chhaganrao Jadhav against the judgment and order dated 17/12/2019 pas...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.
2 Aug 2022The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.
6 Oct 2020The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Continuing Breach of Settlement Not Barred by Limitation Under MRTU & PULP Act. Non-Payment of Monthly Dues Constitutes Fresh Cause of Action Each Month, Complaint Filed Within 90 Days of Last Refusal.
20 Nov 2019The Petitioner, Jaihind Sahakari Pani Purvatha Mandali Ltd., a registered co-operative society supplying water to agriculturists, challenged a judgmen...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Assured Career Progression Scheme Case — Recovery of Excess Payment Not Permissible Without Fault of Employee. The court held that recovery of excess payment from a retired employee is not permissible when the payment was not due to any misrepresentation or fraud by the employee, and quashed the order dated 2nd July 2015.
9 Feb 2016The petitioner, Rajaram s/o Namdeo Sudke, was appointed as Road Karkoon on 1st April 1987 and had an unblemished service record. He was appointed and ...
- 124
