Search Results for "government employee transfer"

976 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 976 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Medical Officer in MCGM for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Suspension order set aside as petitioner was not named in FIR and no show cause notice was issued.

The Petitioner, Dr. Shailendra Dattatray Gujar, was a Medical Officer employed with the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (MCGM). He was initially de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Employee Transferred from Government Institute to Government Company. Holds That Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Transfer Without Option to Retain Government Pension Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Prakash Parshuram Mavlankar, was employed with the erstwhile Haffkine Institute, a government entity under the State of Maharashtra, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of LIC Employee Challenging Transfer Order. Transfer is an incident of service and courts should not interfere unless mala fides or violation of statutory rules is established.

The appellant, Ramesh, was working as an Assistant Administrative Officer in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) at Raichur. He was transfer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...