Search Results for "excess salary"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "excess salary"

406 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 406 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Orders Treating Termination Period as Break in Service and Recovery of Excess Amount from Pensionary Benefits. Reinstatement Without Back Wages Does Not Imply Break in Service, and Recovery from Retired Employee is Impermissible Under Supreme Court Guidelines.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a former driver employed by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur, challenging orders that declared his termina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of “Deep and Pervasive Control” in Grant-in-Aid Disputes. Supreme Court Holds ICSSR Not Liable for Salaries of CRRID Employees; Grants Discretionary, Not a Matter of Right

20 Mar 2025

Nature of the Litigation: The case involved a dispute between the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) and Centre for Research in Rura...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging High Court's Declaration of Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act as Unconstitutional Due to Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Lacked Authority Under Article 194(3) to Create Parliamentary Secretary Offices, Rendering Both Enactment and Repeal Invalid Under Constitution of India.

1 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the constitutional validity of the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary (Appointment, Salary and Allowances and Miscellaneous Provi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company's Liability to Pay Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Despite Invalid Driving License — Pay and Recover Principle Applied. Insurance Company Directed to Pay Award Amount to Claimants and Recover from Owner for Breach of Policy Conditions Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

21 Jun 2019

The appeal was filed by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 27/10/2014 of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Pune, in M.A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Owner and Insurer Vicariously Liable for Driver's Negligence Despite Breach of Instructions. The court ruled that carrying excess passengers does not absolve the owner of vicarious liability when the driver was acting in the course of employment under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Jan 2019

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the claimants, Malanbai and Vanita, challenging the judgment of the Claims...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees of Maharashtra Gramin Bank Due to Mistake. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong fixation of pay scale is permissible under Regulation 20 of the Maharashtra Gramin Bank (Officers and Employees) Service Regulations, 2010, and the principle of no recovery does not apply when the employee had knowledge of the mistake.

17 Feb 2017

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra Gramin Bank, were paid excess salary due to a wrong fixation of their pay scale. The bank issued notices see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Refund of Excess Salary Paid Due to Negligence of Employees Not Recoverable. Held that recovery from employees for no fault of theirs would be unjust and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 31/01/2005 and 27/01/2...

High Court

High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Penalty Set Aside, Interest Modified. The court held that penalty under Section 4A(3) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 cannot be imposed on the insurance company and that interest must run from the date of accident, not the date of order.

7 Jul 2014

The case arises from a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by Pandurang Dhere, a driver who sustained a fracture injury in a truck...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Divorce and Maintenance in Hindu Marriage Act Case — Husband's Cruelty and Desertion Established Despite Dismissal of Earlier Petition. The court held that filing false complaints and desertion constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) and desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and granted divorce with permanent alimony and child maintenance.

16 Sep 2011

The appellant, Smt. Shehnaz Arvind Mudbhatkal (the wife), filed Family Court Appeal No. 38 of 2006 against the judgment and decree dated 30th Septembe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ESI Contributions Paid Under Mistake of Law — Employer Entitled to Restitution Under Section 72 of Indian Contract Act. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Claim for Refund Under Section 75 of ESI Act, 1948.

24 Jun 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Hotels Co. Limited (owner of Taj Mahal Hotel and Taj Intercontinental) and its shareholder, filed a writ petition seeking...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)