Search Results for "distinctive feature"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distinctive feature"

145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Transfer Application in Civil Suit, Clarifying Common High Court's Jurisdiction Under CPC. Common High Court Has Power Under Section 24 CPC to Transfer Proceedings Between Civil Courts in Different States Within Its Territorial Jurisdiction, as Both Courts Are Subordinate, While Section 25 Applies Only to States with Different High Courts.

28 Feb 2023

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the appellants in 2007 in the District Court at Dimapur, Nagaland, seeking declaration of right, title, in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for Playground Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over Two Decades. The court held that the reservation under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, 1966 lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated despite notice, directing de-reservation.

18 Nov 2022

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No. 362/2B1 at Chalisgaon, challenged the continued reservation of a portion of their land for a 'play-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Section 3 of Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 in Reference Regarding Land Transfers by Non-Tribals. The court held that Section 3 applies to any transfer of land originally belonging to a tribal, regardless of the transferor's status, and that the burden of proof is on the claimant tribal to show original tribal ownership and first transfer in contravention.

21 Apr 2023

The case involves a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a recurring question regarding the interpretation of Section 3 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

5 Jan 2017

The appellants, Dnyanoba Baburao Pandhare and Lilawatibai Pandhare, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 323, 324 read with 34 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Partnership Dispute — No Interference Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940 as Awards Based on Appreciation of Evidence. The court upheld the Single Judge's order dismissing petitions challenging arbitral awards, finding no error in the conclusion that the awards were based on evidence.

1 Aug 2014

The case involves four appeals filed by family members challenging the order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing their petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Priority of Claims Against Sale Proceeds of Arrested Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The court directed that the order of priority of claims against the sale proceeds shall be determined after the expiration of a period specified by the court and that a notice inviting claims be published under Sub-rule 951(3) of the Bombay High Court Rules.

19 Oct 2012

The plaintiff, Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. BOS ANGLER and its owner Bos Angler AS,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition to Refer Industrial Dispute to Arbitration — Industrial Disputes Under I.D. Act Are Not Arbitrable. The court held that disputes under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recovery of wages cannot be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a public limited company in the air transport industry, filed three writ petitions challenging the reject...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Winding Up of Bangalore Development Authority for Non-Payment of Arbitral Award. Court holds that a statutory authority cannot be wound up under the Companies Act, 2013, and the remedy lies in execution of the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2019

The petitioner, IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Ltd. (formerly Maytas Infra Ltd.), a company engaged in infrastructure construction, had an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in SC & ST Act and IPC Rape Case Involving Blind Scheduled Caste Victim. The Court affirmed that the offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was committed 'on the ground' of caste due to the victim's vulnerability from blindness and Scheduled Caste status, and the rape under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was proven beyond reasonable doubt.

27 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated 3 August 2019, which affirmed the conviction of the appellant for offences ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)